19 Comments
Jun 1Liked by S Peter Davis

Really? If one of these kids turns out "okay", that's a win? By "Okay" they mean having the same philosophy as theirs, but more thought out. Gross. They don't even care if their children grow up happy. They don't even care if all the kids turn out to be serial murderers. Kids don't rate a heated home? Right a thesis that satisfies the wardens so they can have their toys back?

They should have gotten sterilized, but maybe the kids will get lucky and the parents will realize they are selfish beyond belief. Maybe the narcissists can grow up past that fourteen or fifteen year old stage where one is intrigued by unique parenting methods and the possible effects it may have on kids for that brief moment while chatting about life with friends.

I certainly hope their theories fade out faster than Pet Rocks.

Expand full comment
May 31Liked by S Peter Davis

You may be "shocked" to learn that the new-new LA snotty thing is... Black-wrapped Cybertrucks; glossy, flat and everything in between. I've seen at least 5 in the last two days.

Yeah, theyre hideous. Kinda the point. A rolling FU.

Expand full comment

Saw my first Cybertruck in the wild a couple days ago, and, migod, is it even stupider looking than the pictures.

Expand full comment

Yup, me too. Saw one in Vegas over the weekend. Such a silly product from such a silly person...

Expand full comment

I point and laugh every time I see one. They're so silly looking!

Expand full comment
Jun 1Liked by S Peter Davis

The parents' job is to allow the child's mind full rein so it may "grow with the dignity of doubt.. rather than the sevility of imposed convictions." Peter Ustinov.

Expand full comment
author

Fantastic quote, thank you, saving that one.

Expand full comment
Jun 1Liked by S Peter Davis

I was so grossed out by that piece. The smack was bad, yes, but I was already shouting at the walls at the bedroom/office reveal. These people should not be having children and I hope those kids find their way out of that cult and into healthy lives as soon as they are able.

Expand full comment

No desire to go to Mars when I can listen to David Bowie on Earth, do not want to be in the Trump family photo where everyone has it so good that they're wearing a fake smile, and I only intend living one life (but hope it's long and without too much involuntarily shitting and pissing in the end).

Expand full comment

"Evil begins when you begin to treat people as things." So sayeth my favourite modern philosopher, Sir Terry Pratchett.

Expand full comment

“there’s at least one thing that Immanuel put forward that I absolutely one hundred percent agree with, and that is it’s mandatory to treat individual human beings as ends-in-themselves and never means-to-an-end”

If I may ask, why do you agree with this?

Expand full comment
author

Because there is not and never will be such a thing as an NPC. If you manipulate people against their consent then you're stealing part of the one and only life experience they will ever have for your project. I think that's profoundly evil.

Expand full comment

Interesting. Do you not think atheism or modern science is manipulative?

Expand full comment
author

I don't understand what you mean

Expand full comment

Do you not think deception manipulates people against their consent?

Expand full comment

Slow clap and standing ovation over here!

Expand full comment

Why do you believe human lives are not morally interchangable?

Expand full comment
author

I'm not sure what you mean by morally interchangeable but I don't consider us to be fungible entities the way that utilitarians tend to. It's distinct from supporting raising the level of happiness in general, which I do--It would make me feel good, for example, to know that someone is happy, but I can't feel *their* happiness. We're all locked in our own heads, permanently and exclusively. So I don't like, for example, the idea that the Collins or Musk children have to donate the only life experience they will ever have to serve their parents' own ends or a hypothetical future cause that they will not see and will not benefit them.

I don't know if that answers your question, haha, but I wrote it all out so Imma post it

Expand full comment
deletedMay 31
Comment deleted
Expand full comment